Policies and Guidelines for Annual Conference Presenters
- All program presenters must register and pay for the conference. If they are attending the conference only on the day of their presentation, they may register for just that day.
- All accepted presenters must send any edits to their presentation
information and/or professional affiliation information for the program
book no later than January 29, 2020. There are no exceptions for this
- Panels should include no more than five papers or presentations in order to allow time for audience involvement in the session. All panels must have a moderator or convener who is responsible for ensuring that panelists have communicated with each other before the conference.
- Each panelist must abide by the time constraints. The moderator should allot at least 15 minutes at the end of the session for question and answer with the audience.
- Every effort should be made to have a diverse mix of presenters, including both academic and practitioner presenters.
- Participation in the conference program is limited to one presentation per person, regardless of session format (Section symposia, ASPA workshops or ASPA panels) to avoid over scheduling presenters and maximize participation. In addition to presenting in one session, an individual may also serve as a Moderator and/or Discussant on another session.
- A topic/presenter from a rejected fully formed panel may be accepted individually and placed within a different panel or workshop.
- The Program Committee reserves the right to alter, combine and edit proposals as it plans sessions for the conference.
- Speakers who cancel their participation after accepting panelist slots two consecutive years in a row may be deemed ineligible to participate on future panels.
- Sessions are scheduled Friday through Tuesday, April 3-7, in Anaheim, California.
- Concurrent panel sessions and workshops are 75 minutes long.
- ASPA will supply LCD projectors and screens in rooms, but not computers. Presenters must bring their own laptops to project their presentations. AV staff will be on hand in case panels experience technical difficulties. Costs for extraordinary audio-visual needs, including internet, will be borne by the speaker requiring them.
What type of proposals does ASPA invite?
The ASPA conference encourages four types of session submissions: fully formed panels, individual papers or topics for panel placement, workshops and submission for Section-hosted symposia.
What is a fully formed panel?
This is a proposal submission that includes four or five papers or topics that would form a single conference panel session. It includes a panel chair and an optional discussant. The convener (individual organizing the proposal) of a panel proposal is responsible for recruiting all of the papers and other components, and planning for the panel execution.
What does a strong panel look like?
A strong panel contains four or five papers, a chair and at least one discussant. The panel description ties the papers together and clearly indicates how the panel relates to the conference theme and the selected policy and/or cross cutting area. Strong panels include a diverse range of participants taking into account practitioners and scholars; race, gender and other demographics; and research methods and perspectives.
How are individual papers assigned?
Program co-chairs and track reviewers are responsible for finding an appropriate session for an accepted paper proposal. Highly rated individual papers are assigned to a panel session with other related and commonly themed, but separately submitted, papers.
What is a workshop?
This refers to a professional development session that is most relevant to practitioners. Workshops usually feature one or two presenters. The presentation is focused on best practices and functional takeaways for attendees.
What are symposia?
These are multi-session programs focused on a specific topic. They are half- or full-day events that usually are sponsored by ASPA Sections, typically taking place either the Friday or Saturday of the conference. To submit your proposal for consideration within a symposia, please indicate the symposia of interest during the proposal submission process.
What are the descriptions for the various panel roles?
A convener is an individual responsible for bringing presenters together to address an issue, problem or opportunity. The convener’s primary responsibility is to serve as the organizer and administrator of the collaboration, and to carry out the preliminary and follow-up tasks that ensure the panel proceeds smoothly. The role of convener and moderator are often carried out by the same person, but this is not a requirement.
The moderator is responsible for the engagement and timeliness of the panel and ensures the panel is a lively and productive experience for panel members and the audience. The moderator (also known as chair) should arrange at least one meeting, in person or by phone, among the panel members prior to the conference and the panel. On the day of the panel, the chair is responsible for managing time (that the panel starts on time and each panelist has an equitable share of the available time). The chair also ensures that at least 15 minutes of the panel time is set aside for conversation with the members of the audience and that the panel ends at the allotted time.
It is the presenter’s responsibility to communicate the big ideas and rich commentary that is at the core of the issue and/or paper. Under no circumstances should a paper—or its summary—be read to the audience.
Rather, the presenter should think carefully about major themes, what members of the audience would find most useful and how the topic fits into the panel’s and conference's overall themes. The audience can always read the paper later; they have selected the panel for a chance to exchange ideas. It is the presenter’s responsibility to enable this exchange.
The discussant is responsible for synthesizing the big ideas and linking them together throughout the discussion. The discussant provides insights into each presenter’s value by distilling the central arguments, commenting on the methods, suggesting what implications have the most value and providing a measure of peer review. After hearing the individual presentations, the discussant should identify—and share with the audience—the common themes that unite them.
For papers with multiple authors, the authors can be listed separately as co-authors if not presenting on the panel.
Does ASPA collect conference papers?
Yes, after the conference concludes. Presenters will have the opportunity in mid-April to share their knowledge by sending their presentations and/or papers to the ASPA staff so they can be posted to ASPA’s website.
For the purposes of sharing research prior to the conference, panel presenters must share papers/presentation topics with fellow co-presenters no later than two weeks prior to the conference (March 20, 2020).
Below is a list of the criteria that is adopted by track reviewers and conference co-chairs when ranking and selecting panel sessions for the Annual Conference:
Considerations to keep in mind:
Relevance to Conference Theme: 2020 Vision for Politics, Policy and Administration
- Relevance to the conference theme and one of the tracks (see considerations below)
- Emphasis on one or more of the following: efficiency, effectiveness, economy, equity, ethics and empowerment
- Quality and depth of attention to topics at the leading edge of public administration issues
- Scope of the topic and its breadth of audience appeal
- Relevance to practitioners and scholars in linking theory and practice
- Learning objectives identified and applicable to practitioners (workshops)
- Attractiveness of the executive summary
- Practitioner participation in panels
ASPA’s 2020 Annual Conference will engage and empower scholars, administrators, nonprofit leaders and public service professionals across the field through thoughtful dialogue, information sharing and respectful debate on a 2020 Vision for Politics, Policy and Administration. As this year’s theme implies, 20:20 vision is a perfect state. Often, however, that vision is tempered by realities and dynamics frequently outside our control. Yet when we emphasize and model efficiency, effectiveness, economy, equity, ethics and empowerment—along with ASPA’s core values and the foundations of public service—we get closer to realizing that vision.
The 2020 conference will delve into this theme by acknowledging our imperfect past, understanding current challenges and identifying innovations and paths toward a 20:20 future. Six concentrations will guide our time together: finance; global public administration; governance; infrastructure; leadership and management; and social equity. Detailed track descriptions are online here
, including sub-categories to guide your submissions. Please review each description and think carefully about where your proposal fits best. Many topics featured in prior conferences—human resources, public safety, emergency management, public administration theory, legal and ethical frameworks, the environment and technology—are as important to this dialogue as ever. They are incorporated within this year’s tracks.
Proposals must pay special attention to efficiency, effectiveness, economy, equity, ethics and empowerment, and the role they play in the research or practice you intend to discuss. They are our cornerstone. Our research is not complete without considering their effects. Our practice is not balanced if they are not fundamental to our programs.
Program chairs and track reviewers pay close attention to the potential for discussion in a proposal. Panel moderators and presenters are reminded that presentations should NOT be read.
It is important that engagement is highlighted as a key part of a proposal.
Panels and workshops are meant to be interactive sessions. Workshops allow practitioners to learn about practical solutions to contemporary issues encountered in the workplace. They are are considered "hands on" sessions that should draw attendees into the discussion and offer useful solutions and applications in the work environment. The goal is to create opportunities for attendees to exchange ideas. Workshops should not solely consist of lectures. Workshop proposals should describe how the presenters will incorporate attendees in the learning process. They will need to list three measurable learning objectives identifying what attendees can expect to take away from the session.
Number of panel sessions:
The set number of panel slots assigned to a track is decided by the program chairs, in consultation with the track reviewers. Program planners are guided by the goal of creating a quality program.